There is no official scorecard on this one, but if there is one word I’ve heard more than any other from Democratic politicians over the past several years, it might be “democracy.”
Kamala Harris repeatedly made “democracy is on the ballot” a central theme of her presidential campaign. California Gov. Gavin Newsom declared that “democracy is under assault across this nation.” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries promised that “we are going to fight for our democracy, fight for the rule of law, and fight for the Constitution against those who want to turn back the clock.”
JACKSON THOMPSON: WASHINGTON STATE DEMOCRATIC PARTY CALLS GIRLS’ SPORTS INITIATIVE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
These are three examples from a potential list of 3,000. One question, though: Why does democracy stop mattering once these Democratic politicians don’t get what they want?
In this case, I’m referring specifically to the passing of Washington state’s Initiative 638, which would enforce the separation of boys and girls in K-12 sports if it goes into effect. The reason I used “if” is because there are a lot of Democrats in Washington hellbent on overturning the will of the people.
To be clear, this was not a tight race. The AP called it when the “yes” side of I-638 held a 13% lead with 88 percent of the votes counted. But almost immediately, Democrats decided democracy wasn’t a necessity so much as an inconvenience.
It started with Rep. Pramila Jayapal, who spoke openly about overturning the initiatives at an election-night gathering before the results were even final.
“We are going to take our state back,” Jayapal said. “We’re going to start planning for how we overturn these bad initiatives and how we go back to loving everyone with gender inclusivity the way we have for decades.”
It continued with Washington State Democratic Party Chair Shasti Conrad, who made clear two days later that the election results weren’t going to settle the issue.
“While this result is incredibly disheartening, voters in Washington and across the nation rejected anti-trans candidates up and down the ballot,” Conrad said in a statement last Thursday. “The fight over I-638 is just beginning. We believe this initiative is unconstitutional on its face and support organizations planning to challenge it in court.”
THE CRAIG CARTON SHOWâUNFILTERED, UNAPOLOGETIC AND UNMISSABLE. DOWNLOAD HIS DAILY PODCAST NOW!
One of those organizations is Gender Justice League, a Seattle-based LGBTQ advocacy group whose executive director, Danni Askini, told KUOW that it was exploring legal options to challenge the initiative.
“We are having active conversations with our partners and also evaluating what legal options are available to us,” Askini said. “If there is an avenue, we will challenge this ballot measure in court on behalf of our members and our community and trans youth.”
There was even a writer named Robert Cruickshank, who penned an essay for The Bulletin in Seattle comparing I-638 to California’s Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage in the Golden State in 2008. Cruickshank laid out a two-pronged strategy for overturning I-638: challenging it in court while simultaneously pursuing a p
